|
Practically speaking, it is impossible for Wikipedia to be 100 percent consistent, and its rules will therefore [[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules|never be perfect]]. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then consider [[WP:STICK|leaving the issue alone and accepting that the outcome was not what you wanted]]. Do not resort to disruptive tactics in an attempt to sway consensus.
михаела thvc
==Examples==
bbnvbcdbcvsbxvggvdg gegdxv fvgre4gtbsbnddfhc jehfdjhxsdb dhchnhbfcvdfjsjhjdshsdybyshv dsehdvcdbfq bbdxvbc Qbv CQZXZCVBMNC CYTE
*'''If''' you have nominated an article for [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|deletion]], and others vote to keep it...
**'''do''' participate in the discussion, and if applicable note examples of similar article subjects which consensus has rejected.
**'''do not''' create an article on what you consider to be a similarly unsuitable topic just to get it listed for deletion and have others make the same arguments you are making.
*'''If''' someone deletes from an article "''unimportant''" information which you consider to in fact be important to the subject...
**'''do''' explain on the article's talk page why you feel the material merits inclusion
**'''do not''' delete most of the remaining article as "''unimportant''".
*'''If''' you have added a reference which someone then removes because the source is [[WP:SPS|self-published]]...
**'''do''' explain why the use of the source in question was appropriate in that instance, or find a [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable third-party published]] source for the information
**'''do not''' summarily remove all references to self-published sources from an article
*'''If''' you think someone unjustifiably removed "''unsourced''" content...
**'''do''' find a source for it, make the referencing clear if it was already present, or explain why the content in question shouldn't require a cited source
**'''do not''' remove all apparently unsourced content on the page
*'''If''' you feel that a policy or guideline should be changed, and others disagree...
**'''do''' explain what you see as the problem with the rule as written, and perhaps post a notice of the discussion at the [[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)|Village pump]]
**'''do not''' attempt to enforce the existing rule with the aim of provoking opposition to it
*'''If''' you feel that it is too easy to add misinformation to Wikipedia...
**'''do''' watch [[Special:RecentChanges|recent changes]] and fact-check anything that looks at all suspicious
**'''do not''' create an elaborate [[Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes|hoax]] with hopes of getting publicity for it
*'''If''' you think that this list of examples has become excessively long and boring...
**'''do''' opine that the guideline's purpose would remain clear even if half of the examples were deleted
**'''do not''' add [[47 (number)#As an in-joke|47]] more examples just to show that people [[Wikipedia:Too long; didn't read|won't actually read]] such lists
==Important note==
| 