ৱিকিপিডিয়া:প্ৰশাসকবৃন্দ: বিভিন্ন সংশোধনসমূহৰ মাজৰ পাৰ্থক্য

নিকাকৰণ বট পৰীক্ষা; Lachit SpellChecker ৰ সহায়ত
3 নং শাৰী:
__NOTOC__
<div style="background:#E3F9DF; padding:0 10px; border:1px solid #AAA;">
{{center|<big>'''<big>প্ৰশাসকসকল</big> হৈছে [[/Tools|কিছুমান নিৰ্দিষ্ট সঁজুলি]] ব্যৱহাৰ কৰিব পৰা অতি বিশ্বাসযোগ্য সদস্য। তেঁওলোকৰতেওঁলোকৰ পৰা সদায়ে ভদ্ৰ ব্যৱহাৰ, ভালৰ বাবে সঁজুলিসমূহৰ ব্যৱহাৰ আৰু বিতৰ্কিত বিষয়ত সঁজুলিৰ ব্যৱহাৰ <big>কেতিয়াও নকৰে</big> বুলি আশা কৰা হয়। '''</big>}}</div>
{{ৱিকিপিডিয়া অনুবাদ}}
 
13 নং শাৰী:
 
বৰ্তমান অসমীয়া ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ প্ৰশাসকবৃন্দ:
* [[সদস্য:Psneog|প্রভাকৰপ্ৰভাকৰ শৰ্মা নেওগ]]
* [[সদস্য:Bishnu Saikia|বিষ্ণু শ‍ইকীয়া]]
* [[সদস্য:Gitartha.bordoloi|গীতাৰ্থ বৰদলৈৰ]]
* [[সদস্য:দিব্য দত্ত|দিব্য দত্ত]]
<!--
প্ৰশাসকবৃন্দৰ প্ৰথম কাৰ্য্য হ'ল ৱিকিপেডিয়াৰ interface অসমীয়ালৈ ভাঙনি কৰা ৷কৰা। [[ৱিকিপেডিয়া:ভাঙনি]]
-->
 
'''প্ৰশাসক''', সাধাৰণতে '''এডমিন''' বা '''ছাইছপছ''' ([[system operator|'''sys'''tem '''op'''erator'''s''']]), সকল হৈছে কিছুসংখ্যক কাৰিকৰী বৈশিষ্টবৈশিষ্ট্য (সজুলিসঁজুলি) ব্যৱহাৰৰ অধিকাৰ লাভ কৰা বিশ্বাসী ৱিকিপিডিয়া সম্পাদক। উদাহৰণস্বৰূপে, প্ৰশাসকসকলে পৃষ্ঠা এটা [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:Protection policy|সুৰক্ষিত]], [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:Deletion policy|ডিলিট]] আৰু পুণৰোদ্ধাৰপুনৰুদ্ধাৰ, [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:Redirect|পুনঃনিৰ্দেশ]]ৰ ওপৰেৰে [[সহায়:Moving a page|স্থানান্তৰ]], [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:RevDel|পৃষ্ঠা সম্পাদনাৰ ইতিহাস লুকুৱাব আৰু মোহাৰিব]], [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:Protection policy|সুৰক্ষিত পৃষ্ঠা]] সম্পাদনা, আৰু কোনো সম্পাদকক [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:Blocking policy|বাৰণ]] কৰিব পাৰে। অধিক তথ্যৰ বাবে [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:Administrators/Tools|প্ৰশাসক সজুলিসঁজুলি]] চাওক।
 
Administrators assume these responsibilities as volunteers; they are not acting as employees of the [[Wikimedia Foundation]]. They are never required to use their tools and must never use them to gain an advantage in a dispute in which they are involved. Administrators should not be confused with [[m:System administrators|Wikimedia system administrators]] ("sysadmins").
 
বৰ্তমান অসমীয়া ৱিকিপিডিয়াত {{NUMBEROFADMINS}} জন প্ৰশাসক আছে।
 
<div class="plainlinks plainlinks2 horizontal" style="margin-bottom:0.8em; text-align:center; font-weight:bolder;">
38 নং শাৰী:
[[ৱিকিপিডিয়া]]ৰ প্ৰথম অৱস্থাত সকলো সদস্যই প্ৰশাসকৰ কাম কৰিছিল, using a single password that was handed out fairly freely.<ref>[[:nostalgia:Wiki Administrators]]</ref> The current form of administratorship is the result of a code modification which changed from password access to [[role-based access control]]. Under this, individual accounts could be flagged per the roles they could perform, which in turn determined functions/tools they could access.
 
During this transition, it was emphasized that administrators should never develop into a special subgroup. Rather, administrators should be a part of the community like other editors, with no special powers or [[privileges]] when acting as editors. Administrators are also expected to observe a high standard of conduct. Likewise, in general, most maintenance and administration aspects of Wikipedia can be conducted by anyone, without the specific technical functions granted to administrators. An often paraphrased comment about the title and process of administratorship was made by [[Jimmy Wales]] in February 2003—referred to as "sysops" here:
 
{{shortcut|WP:DEAL|WP:NOBIGDEAL}}
{{quote|<p>I just wanted to say that becoming a sysop is *not a big deal*.</p><p>I think perhaps I'll go through semi-willy-nilly and make a bunch of people who have been around for awhile sysops. I want to dispel the aura of "authority" around the position. It's merely a technical matter that the powers given to sysops are not given out to everyone.</p><p>I don't like that there's the apparent feeling here that being granted sysop status is a really special thing.</p>|Jimmy Wales|[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2003-February/001149.html wikimedia.org archive entry]}} Stated simply, while the correct use of the tools and appropriate conduct should be considered important, merely "being an administrator" should not be.
 
As Wikipedia's worldwide cultural impact and visibility grew, and as the community grew with it, the role of administrators evolved. Standards for adminship have risen considerably and the community generally holds administrators to a higher standard of editorial and interpersonal conduct. Given the lengthy procedures required to remove administrative access, often including a [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:RFC/U|request for comments]] followed by a [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ARB|arbitration]], requests for adminship are carefully vetted.
 
== Becoming an administrator ==
86 নং শাৰী:
=== Administrator conduct ===
{{shortcut|WP:NOTPERFECT}}
Administrators are expected to lead by example and to behave in a respectful, civil manner in their interactions with others. Administrators are expected to follow Wikipedia policies and to perform their duties to the best of their abilities. Occasional mistakes are entirely compatible with adminship; administrators are not expected to be perfect. However, sustained or serious disruption of Wikipedia is incompatible with the status of administrator, and consistently or egregiously poor judgment may result in the removal of administrator status. Administrators should strive to model appropriate standards of courtesy and civility to other editors and to one another.<sup>[[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV#Decorum and civility|[2]]][[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:Requests for arbitration/Daniel Brandt deletion wheel war#Expectations and role of administrators|[3]]][[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid/Proposed decision#Responsibility of administrators|[4]]][[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:Requests for arbitration/InShaneee#Administrators|[5]]]</sup>
 
Administrators should bear in mind that they have hundreds of colleagues. Therefore, if an administrator finds that he or she cannot adhere to site policies and remain civil (even toward users exhibiting problematic behavior) while addressing a given issue, then the administrator should bring the issue to a noticeboard or refer it to another administrator to address, rather than potentially compound the problem by poor conduct.
92 নং শাৰী:
=== Accountability ===
{{shortcut|WP:ADMINACCT}}
Administrators are accountable for their actions involving administrator tools, and unexplained administrator actions can demoralize other editors who lack such tools. Subject only to the bounds of [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:Civility|civility]], [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:No personal attacks|avoiding personal attacks]], and reasonable [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:Assume good faith|good faith]], editors are free to question or to criticize administrator actions. Administrators are expected to respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Wikipedia-related conduct and administrator actions and to justify them when needed.
 
Administrators who seriously, or repeatedly, act in a problematic manner or have lost the trust or confidence of the community may be sanctioned or have their access removed. In the past, this has happened or been suggested for:
126 নং শাৰী:
== Misuse of administrative tools ==
<!--
ALSO COPIED TO WP:ADMIN/TOOLS, DUE TO IMPORTANCE.
TRANSCLUSION USED TO ENSURE IT'S UP TO DATE.
 
Link to edit this section:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators/Misuse_of_tools_section&action=edit
 
THE TEXT INCLUDES #ifeq: EXPRESSIONS TO MODIFY WORDING BASED ON THE PAGE USED. TAKE CARE :)
-->
{{Wikipedia:Administrators/Misuse of tools section}}
 
=== Reversing another administrator's action ===
Administrators are expected to have good judgment, and are presumed to have considered carefully any actions or decisions they carry out as administrators. Administrators may disagree, but except for clear and obvious mistakes, administrative actions should not be reversed without good cause, careful thought and (if likely to be objected) usually some kind of courtesy discussion.
 
=== {{anchor|Wheel war}}Reinstating a reverted action ("Wheel warring") ===