ভূপাল দুৰ্ঘটনা: বিভিন্ন সংশোধনসমূহৰ মাজৰ পাৰ্থক্য

No edit summary
No edit summary
32 নং শাৰী:
<ref name="MandavilliUnfolding" /><ref name="convictions">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/8725140.stm|title=Bhopal trial: Eight convicted over India gas disaster |date=7 June 2010|work=[[BBC News]]|accessdate=7 June 2010| archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100607185745/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/8725140.stm| archivedate= 7 June 2010 | url-status=live}}</ref>
 
<!--উৎস অনুসৰি মৃতকৰ সংখ্যা ভিন্ন যদিও চৰকাৰী তথ্য মতে তাৎতাৎক্ষণিক মৃতু্্যৰ সংখ্যা ২,২৫৯৷ ২০০৮ চনত মধ্যপ্ৰদেশ চৰকাৰে ৩,৭৮৭
<ref name="rehabilitation1">{{cite web |url=http://www.mp.gov.in/bgtrrdmp/relief.htm |title=Madhya Pradesh Government : Bhopal Gas Tragedy Relief and Rehabilitation Department, Bhopal |publisher=Mp.gov.in |accessdate=28 August 2012 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120518020821/http://www.mp.gov.in/bgtrrdmp/relief.htm |archivedate=18 May 2012 }}</ref>
A government affidavit in 2006 stated that the leak caused 558,125 injuries, including 38,478 temporary partial injuries and approximately 3,900 severely and permanently disabling injuries.<ref name="first3">{{cite news |url=http://www.first14.com/bhopal-gas-tragedy-92-injuries-termed-minor-822.html |title=Bhopal Gas Tragedy: 92% injuries termed "minor" |accessdate=26 June 2010 |newspaper=First14 News |date=21 June 2010 |author=AK Dubey |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100624104141/http://www.first14.com/bhopal-gas-tragedy-92-injuries-termed-minor-822.html |archivedate=24 June 2010 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Others estimate that 8,000 died within two weeks, and another 8,000 or more have since died from gas-related diseases.<ref name="Eckerman2005"/> The cause of the disaster remains under debate. The Indian government and local activists argue that slack management and deferred maintenance created a situation where routine pipe maintenance caused a backflow of water into a MIC tank, triggering the disaster. [[Union Carbide Corporation]] (UCC) argues water entered the tank through an act of sabotage.