ৱিকিপিডিয়া

স্বৰাজ: বিভিন্ন সংশোধনসমূহৰ মাজৰ পাৰ্থক্য

Browse history interactively
আগৰ সম্পাদনানতুন সম্পাদনা →
Content deleted Content added
ভিজুৱেলৱিকিপাঠ্য
18 নং শাৰী:
[[Swami Dayanand Saraswati]], also known as "Nāri-Shudra-Vedoddharak Maharashtra Dev Dayanand Saraswati founder of the [[Arya Samaj]] and a [[Hindu]] reformer, defined ''swaraj'' as the "administration of self" or "democracy". Swami Dayanand Saraswati, beginning with the premise that God had created people free to perform any work they were inclined to choose, then questioned the legitimacy of the foreign British occupation to make the Indian nation slaves on their own land? In the Swami's view, ''swaraj'' was the basis for freedom fighting. [[Dadabhai Navroji]] said that he had learnt the word ''swaraj'' from the ''[[Satyarth Prakash]]'' of Saraswati.{{cn|date=September 2016}}
-->
স্বৰাজে এখন ৰাষ্ট্ৰবিহীন সমাজৰ পোষকতা কৰে ।মহাত্মা গান্ধীৰ মতে, মানুহৰ ওপৰত ৰাষ্ট্ৰৰ সামগ্ৰিক প্ৰভাৱ ক্ষতিকাৰক। তেওঁ ৰাষ্ট্ৰক "আত্মাহীন যন্ত্ৰ" বুলি অভিহিত কৰিছিল যিয়ে জনতাৰ সৰ্বশেষ ক্ষতি কৰে।<ref>Jesudasan, Ignatius. ''A Gandhian theology of liberation''. Gujarat Sahitya Prakash: Ananda India, 1987, pp 236-237.</ref> ৰাষ্ট্ৰৰ উদ্দেশ্য হৈছে জনতাৰ সেৱা কৰা। কিন্তু গান্ধীয়ে ভয় খাইছিল যে ৰাষ্ট্ৰযন্ত্ৰক সেৱা কৰাৰ উপযুক্ত আহিলালৈ ৰূপান্তৰ কৰাৰ অচিলাত, ৰাষ্ট্ৰই নাগৰিকসকলৰ অধিকাৰ খৰ্ব কৰিব আৰু মহাৰক্ষাকৰ্তাৰ ভূমিকাত নিজকে বহুৱাই তেওঁলোকৰ পৰা শোচনীয় নিৰৱতা দাবী কৰিব।<!--(But Gandhi feared that in the name of moulding the state into a suitable instrument of serving people, the state would abrogate the rights of the citizens and arrogate to itself the role of grand protector and demand abject acquiescence from them)-->ই এক বিপৰ্যয়ৰ পৰিস্থিতিৰ সৃষ্টি কৰিব য'ত নাগৰিকসকলক ৰাষ্ট্ৰৰ পৰা বিচ্ছিন্ন কৰা হ'ব আৰু একে সময়তে ইয়াক বন্ধ কৰি ৰখা হ'ব, যি গান্ধীৰ মতে, নিৰাশাজনক আৰু বিপদজনক আছিল।
<!-- But Gandhi feared that in the name of moulding the state into a suitable instrument of serving people, the state would abrogate the rights of the citizens and arrogate to itself the role of grand protector and demand abject acquiescence from them. This would create a paradoxical situation where the citizens would be alienated from the state and at the same time enslaved to it, which, according to Gandhi, was demoralising and dangerous. If Gandhi's close acquaintance with the working of the state apparatus [[Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi in South Africa|in South Africa]] and [[Indian independence movement|in India]] strengthened his suspicion of a centralised, monolithic state, his intimate association with the [[Indian National Congress|Congress]] and its leaders confirmed his fears about the [[corruption in India|corrupting influence of political power]] and his scepticism about the efficacy of the [[politics of India|party systems]] of power politics (due to which he resigned from the Congress on more than one occasion only to be persuaded back each time) and his study of the [[British parliamentary system]]s convinced him that [[representative democracy]] was incapable of meting out justice to people.<ref>''Hind Swaraj''. M.K. Gandhi. Chapter V</ref>
 
Gandhi thought it necessary to evolve a mechanism to achieve the twin objectives of empowering the people and 'empowering' the state. It was for this that he developed the two pronged strategy of resistance (to the state) and reconstruction (through voluntary and participatory social action).{{fact|date=February 2015}}
"https://as.wikipedia.org/wiki/স্বৰাজ"ৰ পৰা অনা হৈছে