ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ৱিকিপিডিয়া কি নহয়: বিভিন্ন সংশোধনসমূহৰ মাজৰ পাৰ্থক্য

No edit summary
/* {{anchor|GUIDE|HOWTO|INTERNET|JARGON|NOTCASE|NOTHOWTO|NOT#JARGON|notjarg|NOTMANUAL}} ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো হাতপুথি, প্ৰসংগপুথি, পাঠ্যপুথি বা বৈজ্ঞানি
100 নং শাৰী:
{{policy shortcut|WP:GAMEGUIDE|WP:NOTCASE|WP:NOTGUIDE|WP:NOTHOW|WP:NOTHOWTO|WP:NOT#JARGON|WP:NOTMANUAL|WP:NOT PAPERS|WP:NOTRECIPE|WP:NOTTEXTBOOK|WP:NOTTRAVEL|WP:NOT#FAQ}}
 
ৱিকিপিডিয়া এক বিশ্বকোষীয় প্ৰসংগ কৰ্ম, কোনো পৰামৰ্শ হাতপুথি, পথনিৰ্দেশিকা পুথি বা পাঠ্যপুথি নহয় । ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ প্ৰৱন্ধ তলত দিয়া বিষয়বোৰৰ দৰে হ'ব নালাগে:
Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not an instruction manual, guidebook, or textbook. Wikipedia articles should not read like:
 
# '''Instructionনিৰ্দেশ manuals.পুথি ।''' While Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places and things, an [[WP:WIAA|article]] should not read like a "how-to" style [[owners manual]], [[advice column]] ([[Wikipedia:Legal disclaimer|legal]], [[Wikipedia:Medical disclaimer|medical]] or otherwise) or [[suggestion box]]. This includes tutorials, walk-throughs, instruction manuals, game guides, and recipes.<ref>The how-to restriction does not apply to the [[Wikipedia:Project namespace|project namespace]], where [[:Category:Wikipedia how-to|"how-to"s relevant to editing Wikipedia itself]] are appropriate, such as [[Wikipedia:How to draw a diagram with Dia]]. Also, in the [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:মূল নামস্থান|মূল নামস্থান]], describing to the reader how other people or things use something is encyclopedic; instructing the reader in the [[imperative mood]] about how to use something is not.</ref> If you are interested in a "how-to" type of manual, you may want to look at [[wikiHow]], [http://how-to.wikia.com/wiki/How_To How to Wiki] or our sister project, [[Wikibooks]].
# '''Travelভ্ৰমণ guides.সহায়িকা ।''' An article on [[Paris]] should mention landmarks, such as the [[Eiffel Tower]] and the [[Louvre]], but not the telephone number or street address of your favorite hotel, nor the current price of a ''café au lait'' on the [[Champs-Élysées]]. Wikipedia is not the place to recreate content more suited to entries in hotel or culinary guides, travelogues, and the like. Notable locations may meet the inclusion criteria, but the resulting articles need not include every tourist attraction, restaurant, hotel or venue, etc. Such details may be welcome at [[Wikitravel]] or [http://travel.wikia.com/wiki/Wikia_Travel Wikia travel] instead.
# '''Videoভিডিঅ' gameগেম guides.হাতপুথি ।''' An article about a [[computer game]] or [[video game]] should summarize the main actions the player does to win the game. But avoid lists of gameplay weapons, items, or concepts. Detailed coverage of specific point values, achievements, time-limits, levels, types of enemies, character moves, character weight classes, and so on are also considered inappropriate. A concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry. See [[WP:VGSCOPE]].
# '''Internetইণ্টাৰনেটৰ guides.হাতপুথি ।''' Wikipedia articles should not exist '''''only''''' to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but should also describe the site in an ''encyclopedic manner'', offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance, which can be kept significantly more up-to-date than most reference sources, since editors can incorporate new developments and facts as they are made known. See the [[Portal:Current events|Current events portal]] for examples.
# '''FAQs.প্ৰশ্নোত্তৰ ।''' Wikipedia articles should not list [[FAQপ্ৰশ্নোত্তৰ|frequentlyসঘনাই askedউঠা questionsপ্ৰশ্ন]] (FAQs). Instead, format the information provided as neutral prose within the appropriate article(s).
# '''Textbooksপাঠ্যপুথি andবা annotatedটীকাযুক্ত texts.পাঠ''' Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not a textbook. The purpose of Wikipedia is to present facts, not to teach subject matter. It is not appropriate to create or edit articles that read as textbooks, with leading questions and systematic problem solutions as examples. These belong on our sister projects, such as [[Wikibooks]], [[Wikisource]], and [[Wikiversity]]. Other kinds of examples, specifically those intended to ''inform'' rather than to ''instruct'', may be appropriate for inclusion in a Wikipedia article.
# '''Scientificবৈজ্ঞানিক journalsআলোচনী andবা researchগৱেষণা papers.পত্ৰ ।''' A Wikipedia article should not be presented on the assumption that the reader is well versed in the topic's field. Introductory language in the [[WP:LEAD|lead]] and initial sections of the article should be written in plain terms and concepts that can be understood by any literate reader of Wikipedia without any knowledge in the given field before advancing to more detailed explanations of the topic. While [[WP:LINK|wikilinks]] should be provided for advanced terms and concepts in that field, articles should be written on the assumption that the reader will not or cannot follow these links, instead attempting to infer their meaning from the text.
# '''Academicবিদ্যায়তনিক language.ভাষা ।''' Texts should be written for everyday readers, not for academics. Article titles should reflect [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names)|common usage]], not academic terminology, whenever possible.
# '''Case studies.''' Many topics are based on the relationship of ''factor X'' to ''factor Y'', resulting in one or more full articles. For example, this could refer to ''situation X'' in ''location Y'', or ''version X'' of ''item Y''. This is perfectly acceptable when the two variables put together represent some culturally significant phenomenon or some otherwise notable interest. Often, separate articles are needed for a subject within a range of different countries, due to substantial differences across international borders; articles such as "[[Slate industry in Wales]]" and "[[Island Fox]]" are fitting examples. Writing about "'''Oak trees in North Carolina'''" or a "'''Blue truck'''", however, would likely constitute a [[WP:POVFORK|POV fork]] or [[WP:OR|মৌলিক গৱেষণা]], and would certainly not result in an encyclopedic article.