ৱিকিপিডিয়া:প্ৰশাসকবৃন্দ: বিভিন্ন সংশোধনসমূহৰ মাজৰ পাৰ্থক্য
Content deleted Content added
SlowPhoton (আলোচনা | বৰঙণি) অ removed my name as I am no longer an admin |
অ r2.7.3) (ৰবট যোগ দিছে :bjn:Wikipidia:Pambakal, gag:Vikipediya:Önderciler পৰিবৰ্তন কৰিছে: se:Wikipedia:Bajásdoallit; cosmetic changes |
||
4 নং শাৰী:
{{policy|Wikipedia:ADM|Wikipedia:ADMIN|Wikipedia:SYSOP|Wikipedia:MOP}}
{{nutshell|'''Administrators''' are users trusted with access to [[/Tools|certain tools]] on the English Wikipedia. They are expected to observe a high standard of conduct, to use the tools fairly, and '''never''' to use them to gain advantage in a dispute.}}
[[
{{Enforcement policy list}}
18 নং শাৰী:
-->
'''Administrators''', commonly known as '''admins''' or '''sysops''' ([[system operator|'''sys'''tem '''op'''erator'''s''']]), are Wikipedia editors trusted with access to restricted technical features ("tools"). For example, administrators can [[
Administrators assume these responsibilities as volunteers; they are not acting as employees of the [[Wikimedia Foundation]]. They are never required to use their tools and must never use them to gain an advantage in a dispute in which they are involved. Administrators should not be confused with [[m:System administrators|Wikimedia system administrators]] ("sysadmins").
25 নং শাৰী:
<div class="plainlinks plainlinks2 horizontal" style="margin-bottom:0.8em; text-align:center; font-weight:bolder;">
[[
[[
[[
[[
[{{fullurl:Special:Listusers/sysop|limit=2000}} All user accounts with admin privileges]
</div>
40 নং শাৰী:
{{quote|<p>I just wanted to say that becoming a sysop is *not a big deal*.</p><p>I think perhaps I'll go through semi-willy-nilly and make a bunch of people who have been around for awhile sysops. I want to dispel the aura of "authority" around the position. It's merely a technical matter that the powers given to sysops are not given out to everyone.</p><p>I don't like that there's the apparent feeling here that being granted sysop status is a really special thing.</p>|Jimmy Wales|[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2003-February/001149.html wikimedia.org archive entry]}} Stated simply, while the correct use of the tools and appropriate conduct should be considered important, merely "being an administrator" should not be.
As Wikipedia's worldwide cultural impact and visibility grew, and as the community grew with it, the role of administrators evolved. Standards for adminship have risen considerably and the community generally holds administrators to a higher standard of editorial and interpersonal conduct. Given the lengthy procedures required to remove administrative access, often including a [[
== Becoming an administrator ==
{{main|Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship}}
: ''Note: Each individual [[m:Wikimedia projects|Wikimedia project]] (including [[m:List of Wikipedias|other Wikipedias]]) may have its own policy for granting adminship.''
48 নং শাৰী:
The [[English Wikipedia]] has no official requirements you must meet to become a Wikipedia administrator. Anyone can apply regardless of their Wikipedia experience. Administrators are expected to uphold the trust and confidence of the community, however, so requests for adminship from users who do not have considerable experience are not usually approved. Each editor will assess their confidence in a particular candidate's readiness in their own way. Before requesting or accepting a nomination, candidates should generally be active and regular Wikipedia contributors for at least several months, be familiar with the procedures and practices of Wikipedia, respect and understand its policies, and have gained the general trust of the community.
If you are interested in requesting adminship, you should first read the [[
'''Only one account of a given person may have administrative tools'''. The only exceptions are [[
Adminship is granted indefinitely, and is only removed upon request, under circumstances involving high-level intervention (see [[#Grievances by users ("Administrator abuse")|administrator abuse]] below), or temporarily for inactive admins.
=== Places where administrators in particular can assist ===
Administrator rights can be particularly helpful for working in certain areas of Wikipedia:
*[[:Category:Administrative backlog|Administrative backlogs]]
*[[
*[[
*[[
*[[
*[[:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion requests]]
*[[
See also [[
"Uninvolved administrators" can also help in the management of [[
== Administrator noticeboards ==
Two main noticeboards exist on which general administrator discussion takes place (any user may post or take part in discussions there):
* [[
* [[
== Expectations of adminship ==
=== Care and judgement ===
If you are granted access, you must exercise care in using these new functions, especially the ability to delete pages and to block users and IP addresses. You can learn how to do these things at the [[
Administrator tools are also used with ''judgment''; it can take some time for a new administrator to learn when it's best to use the tools, and it can take months to gain a good sense of how long a period to set when using tools such as blocking and page protection in difficult disputes. New administrators are strongly encouraged to start slowly and build up experience on areas they are used to, and by asking others if unsure.
=== Administrator conduct ===
{{shortcut|WP:NOTPERFECT}}
Administrators are expected to lead by example and to behave in a respectful, civil manner in their interactions with others. Administrators are expected to follow Wikipedia policies and to perform their duties to the best of their abilities. Occasional mistakes are entirely compatible with adminship; administrators are not expected to be perfect. However, sustained or serious disruption of Wikipedia is incompatible with the status of administrator, and consistently or egregiously poor judgment may result in the removal of administrator status. Administrators should strive to model appropriate standards of courtesy and civility to other editors and to one another.<sup>[[
Administrators should bear in mind that they have hundreds of colleagues. Therefore, if an administrator finds that he or she cannot adhere to site policies and remain civil (even toward users exhibiting problematic behavior) while addressing a given issue, then the administrator should bring the issue to a noticeboard or refer it to another administrator to address, rather than potentially compound the problem by poor conduct.
=== Accountability ===
{{shortcut|WP:ADMINACCT}}
Administrators are accountable for their actions involving administrator tools, and unexplained administrator actions can demoralize other editors who lack such tools. Subject only to the bounds of [[
Administrators who seriously, or repeatedly, act in a problematic manner or have lost the trust or confidence of the community may be sanctioned or have their access removed. In the past, this has happened or been suggested for:
* "Bad faith" adminship ([[
* Breach of basic policies (attacks, biting/civility, edit warring, privacy, etc.)
* Conduct elsewhere incompatible with adminship (off-site attacking, etc.).
* Failure to communicate<sup>[[
* Repeated/consistent poor judgment
=== Security ===
{{main|Wikipedia:User account security}}
It is extremely important that administrators have [[Password strength|strong passwords]] and [[
Administrators should '''never''' share their password or account with any other person, for any reason. If they find out their password has been compromised, or their account has been otherwise compromised (even by an editor or individual they know and trust), they should attempt to change it immediately, or otherwise report it to a bureaucrat for temporary de-sysopping. Users who fail to report unauthorized use of their account will be desysopped. Unauthorized use is considered 'controversial circumstances', and access will not be automatically restored.
109 নং শাৰী:
{{anchor|INVOLVED|UNINVOLVED|involved|uninvolved}}
In general, editors should not act as administrators in cases in which they have been involved. This is because involved administrators may have, or may be seen as having, a [[
One important caveat is that an administrator who has interacted with an editor or topic area ''purely in an administrative role'', or whose prior involvement are minor or obvious edits which do not speak to bias, is ''not'' involved and is not prevented from acting in an administrative capacity in relation to that editor or topic area. This is because one of the roles of administrators is precisely to deal with such matters, at length if necessary. Warnings, calm and reasonable discussion and explanation of those warnings, advice about community norms, and suggestions on possible wordings and approaches, do not make an administrator 'involved'.
In cases which are straightforward, (e.g. [[
A user seeking administrator or uninvolved user help may use the '''{{tlx|uninvolved|type|details}}''' template to request assistance. Requests will appear in [[:Category:Requests for uninvolved help]] until removed.
== Grievances by users ("Administrator abuse") ==
{{shortcut|WP:ADMINABUSE|WP:ADMINISTRATORABUSE|WP:GBU}}
If a user believes an administrator has acted improperly, he or she should express their concerns directly to the administrator responsible and try to come to a resolution in an orderly and civil manner. However, if the matter is not resolved between the two parties, users can take further action (see [[#Disputes or complaints|Dispute resolution process]] below). For more possibilities, see [[
== Misuse of administrative tools ==
<!--
ALSO COPIED TO WP:ADMIN/TOOLS, DUE TO IMPORTANCE.
137 নং শাৰী:
=== {{anchor|Wheel war}}Reinstating a reverted action ("Wheel warring") ===
{{dablink|[[
{{shortcut|WP:WW|WP:WHEEL|WP:0WW|WP:RRA}}
144 নং শাৰী:
: '''Do not repeat a reversed administrative action when you know that another administrator opposes it. Do not continue a chain of administrative reversals without discussion. Resolve admin disputes <u>by discussing</u>.'''
Wheel warring usually results in an immediate [[
Possible indications of an incipient wheel war:
151 নং শাৰী:
* Abruptly undoing administrator actions without consultation.
Wikipedia works on the spirit of [[
* Seek constructive discussion,
* Follow [[
* [[
=== Exceptional circumstances ===
There are a few exceptional circumstances to this general principle. (Note: these are one-way exceptions):
* '''[[
* '''Privacy'''—personal information deleted under the Foundation's privacy policy may be re-deleted if reinstated.
* '''Emergency'''—in certain situations there may arise an emergency that cannot be adjourned for discussion. An administrator should not claim emergency unless there is a ''reasonable belief of a present and very serious emergency'' (i.e., reasonable possibility of actual, imminent, serious harm to the project or a user if not acted upon with administrative tools), and should immediately seek to describe and address the matter, but in such a case the action should not usually be reverted (and may be reinstated) until appropriate discussion has taken place.
* '''Page protection in edit warring'''—reasonable actions undertaken by uninvolved administrators to quell a visible and heated edit war by protecting a contended page should be respected by '''all''' users, and protection may be reinstated if needed, until it is clear the edit war will not resume or consensus agrees it is appropriate to unprotect.
== Review and removal of adminship ==
{{anchor|Removal of adminship (desysopping)}}
If an administrator abuses administrative powers, these powers can be removed. Administrators may be removed by [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimmy Wales]], by [[m:stewards|stewards]], or by a ruling of the [[
There have been several procedures suggested for a [[
{{green|'''Technical note'''}} – removal of rights performed by stewards does <u>not</u> currently show up in the usual user logs. Use {{tlx|Userrights|''username''}} for full links to user rights information and full logs, including the stewards' global logs on [[meta:|meta]] as well, or '''[[
=== Procedural removal for inactive administrators ===
{{Shortcut|WP:INACTIVITY}}
Admin accounts which have made no edits or administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped.<ref>[[
If necessary, the user's userpage should be edited to clarify their status – particularly if any categorization is involved. For example, the userbox <tt>{{tl|User wikipedia/Administrator}}</tt> should be replaced with <tt>{{tlx|1=User wikipedia/Former administrator|2=inactive=yes}}</tt>.
=== Voluntary removal ===
Administrators may request that their access to administrative tools be removed at [[
=== Disputes or complaints ===
{{see|Wikipedia:Dispute resolution}}
In most cases, disputes with administrators should be resolved with the normal dispute resolution process. If the dispute reflects seriously on a user's administrative capacity (blatant misuse of administrative tools, gross or persistent misjudgment or conduct issues), or dialog fails, then the following steps are available.
192 নং শাৰী:
==== Requests for comment on administrator conduct ====
Misuse of administrator access or behavior that is incompatible with adminship may result in an involuntary [[
==== Arbitration Committee review ====
198 নং শাৰী:
This is an involuntary process. Generally, the Arbitration Committee requires that other steps of dispute resolution are tried before it intervenes in a dispute. However, if the matter is serious enough, the Arbitration Committee may intervene without a request for comment on administrator conduct or other steps. Remedies that may be imposed, at the discretion of the Committee, include warnings, admonishments, restrictions, and removal of administrator privileges.
== Related pages ==
{{col-begin}}
{{col-3}}
;History and statistics
* [[User:NoSeptember/Admin stats|Chart of the growth in number of administrators]] (through early 2007)
* [[
* [[User:WereSpielChequers/RFA by month|Requests for Adminship by month]]
* [[User:JamesR/AdminStats|Statistics of administrator activity]]
{{col-3}}
;For administrators:
* [[
* [[
* [[
* [[
* [[
{{col-3}}
;Miscellaneous
* [[
* [[
* [[
{{col-end}}
== External links ==
{{wikiversity|How to be a Wikimedia sysop}}
* [[Meta:Administrators of Wikimedia projects/Wikipedias|Administrators in all Wikipedias]], [[
;Links related to wheel warring
* [http://catb.org/jargon/html/W/wheel-wars.html Wheel wars entry at Jargon dictionary]
230 নং শাৰী:
* [[meatball:TitForTat]]
== Notes ==
<references />
== Related information ==<!-- see [[wp:NAVHEAD]] -->
{{New admin school}}
[[শ্ৰেণী:ৱিকিপিডিয়া প্ৰশাসন]]
Line 261 ⟶ 258:
[[be-x-old:Вікіпэдыя:Адміністрацыя]]
[[bg:Уикипедия:Администратори]]
[[bjn:Wikipidia:Pambakal]]
[[bm:Wikipedia:Administrateurs]]
[[bn:উইকিপিডিয়া:প্রশাসক]]
Line 303 ⟶ 301:
[[fy:Wikipedy:Behearders]]
[[ga:Vicipéid:Riarthóirí]]
[[gag:Vikipediya:Önderciler]]
[[gd:Uicipeid:Administrators]]
[[gl:Wikipedia:Administradores]]
Line 402 ⟶ 401:
[[sco:Wikipedia:Administrators]]
[[sd:Wikipedia:Administrators]]
[[se:Wikipedia:
[[sg:Wikipedia:Wa tî dalisoro]]
[[sh:Wikipedia:Administratori]]
|