ৱিকিপিডিয়া:সম্পাদনা নীতি

এই পৃষ্ঠাত অসমীয়া ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ কেতবোৰ নীতি সন্নিৱিষ্ট কৰা হৈছে। সকলো সম্পাদকে এইবোৰ সাধাৰণতে মানি চলা উচিত। ইয়াত কৰা সালসলনিত ঐকমত্য প্ৰতিফলন হোৱা উচিত।

চমুপথবোৰ: WP:EP WP:EDIT WP:IMPROVE WP:EDITING WP:EG

সংক্ষেপে এই পৃষ্ঠাখন: আপুনি যেতিয়াই পাৰে পৃষ্ঠা এখন উন্নত কৰক, আৰু নিখুঁত নোহোৱাৰ বাবে চিন্তা নকৰিব ।

সম্পাদনাত সহায়ৰ বাবে ৱিকিপিডিয়া:পৃষ্ঠা সম্পাদনা কেনেকৈ কৰিব চাওক

ৱিকিপিডিয়া হাজাৰ হাজাৰ সম্পাদকৰ বৰঙণিৰ ফচল । প্ৰত্যেকজনেই গৱেষণা, কাৰিকৰী জ্ঞান, লিখনশৈলী, তথ্য যোগাৰ আদি বেলেগ বেলেগ দিশত পাৰ্গত, কিন্তু সকলো সহায় কৰিবলৈ ইচ্ছুক | আনকি শ্ৰেষ্ঠ প্ৰৱন্ধকো সম্পূৰ্ণ বুলি গণ্য কৰিব নালাগে; প্ৰত্যেক ন-সম্পাদকেও আমাৰ বিষয়বস্তু ভাল কৰিবলৈ পৰামৰ্শ আগবঢ়াব পাৰে |

ৱিকিপিডিয়াত তথ্য সন্নিৱিষ্ট কৰা

Wikipedia is here to provide information to people; generally speaking, the more information it can provide (subject to certain defined limitations on its scope), the better it is. Please boldly add information to Wikipedia, either by creating new articles or adding to existing articles, and exercise particular caution when considering removing information. However, it is Wikipedia policy that information in Wikipedia should be verifiable and must not be original research. Please show that information is verifiable and not original research by referencing reliable sources. Unsourced information may be challenged and removed, because on Wikipedia a lack of information is better than misleading or false information—Wikipedia's reputation as a trusted encyclopedia depends on the information in articles being verifiable and reliable. To avoid such challenges, the best practice is to provide an "inline citation" at the time the information is added (see: WP:Citing sources for instructions on how to do this, or ask for assistance on the article talk page).

Although reliable sources are required, when developing articles on the basis of sources, avoid copying or closely paraphrasing a copyrighted source. Wikipedia respects others' copyright. You should read the source, understand it, and then express what it says in your own words.

Another way editors can add information to an article is by finding a source for existing unsourced material. This is especially true if you come across statements that are potentially controversial. You do not need to be the person who added the information to add a source and citation for it.

ৱিকিপিডিয়া চলি থকা এটা কাম: নিখুঁত হোৱাৰ প্ৰয়োজন নাই

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত: WP:IMPERFECT WP:PERFECTION

নিখুঁত হোৱাৰ প্ৰয়োজন নাই: ৱিকিপিডিয়া চলি থকা এটা কাম. Collaborative editing means that incomplete or poorly written first drafts can evolve over time into excellent articles. Even poor articles, if they can be improved, are welcome. For instance, one person may start an article with an overview of a subject or a few random facts. Another may help standardize the article's formatting, or have additional facts and figures or a graphic to add. Yet another may bring better balance to the views represented in the article, and perform fact-checking and sourcing to existing content. At any point during this process, the article may become disorganized or contain substandard writing.

This principle is not as broadly endorsed for biographies of living persons. While such articles are also allowed and expected to be imperfect, any contentious unsubstantiated or patently biased information in such articles should be removed until verified or rewritten in a neutral manner.

সমস্যাৰ সমাধান কেনেকৈ কৰিব

চমুপথবোৰ: WP:PRESERVE WP:HANDLE WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM WP:PRESERVED

Fix problems if you can, flag or remove them if you can't. Preserve appropriate content. As long as any of the facts or ideas added to the article would belong in a "finished" article, they should be retained and the writing cleaned up on the spot, or tagged if necessary. If you think a page needs to be rewritten or changed substantially, go ahead and do it, but preserve any content you think might have some value on the talk page, along with a comment about why you made the change. Do not remove good information solely because it is poorly presented; instead, improve the presentation by rewriting the passage. The editing process tends to guide articles through ever-higher levels of quality over time. Great Wikipedia articles can come from a succession of editors' efforts.

Instead of deleting text, consider:

rephrasing or copyediting to improve grammar, more accurately represent the sources, or balance the article's contents
correcting inaccuracy, while keeping the rest of the content intact
moving text within an article or to another article (existing or new)
adding more of what you think is important to make an article more balanced
requesting a citation by adding the {{cn}} tag
doing a quick search for sources and adding a citation yourself
adding appropriate cleanup tags to sections you are unable to fix yourself
repair a dead link if a new URL for the page or an archive of the old one can be located
merging the entire article into another article with the original article turned into a redirect as described at performing a merge

আঁতৰ কৰিবলগীয়া সমস্যা

চমুপথবোৰ: WP:CANTFIX WP:WONTWORK

Several of our core policies discuss situations when it might be more appropriate to remove information rather than to preserve it. WP:Verifiability discusses handling unsourced and contentious material; WP:No original research discusses the need to remove original research; ৱিকিপিডিয়া নহয় কি describes material that is fundamentally inappropriate for Wikipedia; and WP:UNDUE discusses how to balance material that gives undue weight to a particular viewpoint, which might include removal of trivia, tiny minority viewpoints, or material that cannot be supported with high-quality sources. Also, redundancy within an article should be kept to a minimum (excepting the lead, which is meant to be a summary of the entire article, and so is intentionally duplicative). Libel, nonsense and vandalism should be completely removed, as should material that violates copyright.

Special care needs to be taken with biographies of living people, especially when it comes to handling unsourced, or poorly sourced claims about the subject. Editors working on such articles need to know and understand the extra restrictions that are laid out at WP:Biographies of living people.

কথা-বতৰা আৰু সম্পাদনা

সাঁচ:Section

চমুপথবোৰ: WP:FAITACCOMPLI

Be bold in updating articles, especially for minor changes and fixing problems. Previous authors do not need to be consulted before making changes. প্ৰৱন্ধৰ ওপৰত কাৰো অধিকাৰ নাই. If you see a problem that you can fix, do so. Discussion is, however, called for if you think the edit might be controversial or if someone indicates disagreement with your edit (either by reverting your edit and/or raising an issue on the talk page). A BOLD, revert, discuss cycle is used on many pages where changes might often be contentious. Boldness should not mean trying to impose edits against existing consensus or in violation of core policies, such as নিৰপেক্ষ দৃষ্টিভংগী and বিশ্বাসযোগ্যতা.

সহায় কৰক: বুজাওক

Be helpful: explain your changes. When you edit an article, the more radical or controversial the change, the greater the need to explain it. Be sure to leave a comment about why you made the change. Try to use an appropriate সম্পাদনা সাৰাংশ. For larger or more significant changes, the edit summary may not give you enough space to fully explain the edit – in this case leave a note on the প্ৰৱন্ধটোৰ আলোচনা পৃষ্ঠা as well. Remember too that notes on the talk page are more visible, make misunderstandings less likely and encourage discussion rather than সম্পাদনা দ্বন্দ.

গুৰুত্বপূৰ্ণ সালসলনিত সাৱধান হওক: আলোচনা কৰক

Be cautious with major changes: consider discussing them first. With large proposed deletions or replacements, it may be best to suggest changes in a discussion, to prevent সম্পাদনা দ্বন্দ and disillusioning either other editors or yourself (if your hard work is rejected by others). One person's improvement is another's desecration, and nobody likes to see their work "destroyed" without prior notice. If you choose to be very bold, take extra care to justify your changes in detail on the article talk page. This will make it less likely that editors will end up reverting the article back and forth between their preferred versions. To facilitate discussion of a substantial change without filling up the talk page, you can create the new draft in আপোনাৰ সদস্যপৃষ্ঠা (eg User:Example/Lipsum) and link to it on the article discussion page.

কিন্তু ৱিকিপিডিয়া এখন আলোচনা চক্ৰ নহয়

প্ৰধান পৃষ্ঠা: WP:NOTFORUM

Whether you decide to edit very boldly or discuss carefully on the talk page first, please bear in mind that Wikipedia is not a discussion forum. Wikipedia can be a very energetic place, and it is best for the project as a whole if we concentrate our energies on improving articles rather than debating our personal ideas and beliefs. This is discussed further at Wikipedia:Etiquette.

সম্পাদনা নীতি আৰু পথনিৰ্দেশিকাসমূহ

Main page: ৱিকিপিডিয়া:নীতি আৰু পথনিৰ্দেশিকাসমূহ#বিষয়বস্তুৰ সালসলনি

Policies and guidelines are supposed to state what most Wikipedians agree upon, and should be phrased to reflect the present consensus on a subject. In general, more caution should be exercised in editing policies and guidelines than in editing articles. Minor edits to existing pages, such as formatting changes, grammatical improvement and uncontentious clarification, may be made by any editor at any time. However, changes that would alter the substance of policy or guidelines should normally be announced on the appropriate talk page first. The change may be implemented if no objection is made to it or if discussion shows that there is consensus for the change. Major changes should also be publicized to the community in general, as should proposals for new policy pages (see also ৱিকিপিডিয়া:নীতি আৰু পথনিৰ্দেশিকাসমূহ#প্ৰস্তাৱ).

Editing and refactoring talk pages

For guidance on how to edit talk pages see: