ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ভাল প্ৰবন্ধৰ মানদণ্ড

A good article is a satisfactory article that has met the good article criteria but may not have met the criteria for featured articles.^[1] The good article criteria measure decent articles; they are not as demanding as the featured article criteria, which determine our best articles.

অনুত্তীৰ্ণৰ কাৰণসমূহ

If a nominated article meets any of these six criteria it may be quickfailed without further review.^[2]

The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.^[3]
The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.^[4]
There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including {{cleanup}}, {{wikify}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{fact}}, {{citation needed}}, {{clarifyme}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}.)
The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
The article contains significant close paraphrasing or copyright violations.

ভাল প্ৰবন্ধ কোনবোৰ?

A good article is—

ভালদৰে-লিখিত:

(a) প্ৰবন্ধৰ ব্যৱহৃত তথ্যসমূহ স্পষ্ট আৰু লঘূ হোৱাৰ উপৰিও, কপিৰাইট নীতিসমূহক সন্মান জনাৱাৰ লগতে বানান আৰু ব্যাকৰণৰ শুদ্ধ প্ৰয়োগ হ’ব লাগে।; and

(b) ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ মনোমত সজ্জাৰ গঠনৰ নীতি নিৰ্দেশনাসমূহত উল্লেখিত শীৰ্ষ খণ্ড, গঠন, আৰু তালিকাৰ গঠন অনুসৰণ কৰিব লাগে।.^[5]

তথ্যগতভাৱে সঠিক আৰু সত্যাপনযোগ্যতা:

(a) প্ৰবন্ধটোত উল্লিখিত তথ্যসমূহৰ প্ৰমাণ আৰু উদ্ধৃতি নিৰ্দ্ধাৰিত নিয়ম নীতি অনুসৰি কৰাটো বাঞ্চনীয়;

(b) প্ৰবন্ধটোত বিশ্বাসযোগ্য উত্‍সৰৰ পৰা পৰ্যাপ্ত পৰিমাণে তথ্যৰ উদ্ধৃতি দিয়াৰ আৱশ্যক।;^[6] and

(c) ইয়াত কোনো মৈলিক গৱেষণাসমৃদ্ধ তথ্য থাকব নালাগে।.

বিষয়বস্তুৰ ব্যপকতা:

(a) প্ৰবন্ধটোৰ বিষয়বস্তু দিশসমূহ ভালদৰে উল্লেখ কৰা উচিত।;^[7] and

(b) প্ৰবন্ধটোত সন্নিবিষ্ট তথ্যসমূহ মূল দিশসমূহৰ পৰা যাতে ফালৰি কাটি অন্য দিশলৈ গতি নকৰে (সাৰাংশ সজ্জা চাওক) ।.

নিৰপেক্ষ: প্ৰবন্ধটোৰ নিৰপেক্ষতা আৰু তথ্যগত ভাৱে শুদ্ধ আৰি ইয়াক লৈ কোনো বিতৰ্ক নাই।.
স্থিৰ: প্ৰবন্ধটোত নিয়মিতভাৱে কোনোধৰণৰ গুৰুত্বপূৰ্ণ পৰিৱৰ্তন সাধন কৰা নহয় আৰু প্ৰবন্ধটো কোনো সম্পাদনা দ্বন্দৰ চিকাৰ নহয়।.

^[8]

বৰ্ণনামূলক, যদি সম্ভৱ তেনে চিত্ৰসমূহৰ দ্বাৰা:

^[9]

(a) চিত্ৰসমূহৰ কপিৰাইট স্থিতিৰ সম্পৰ্কে বিৱৰণত ভালদৰে উল্লেখিত আৰু লগতে অ-মুক্ত সমলসমূহৰ বাবে বৈধ আংশিক ভাল ব্যৱহাৰ যুক্তি ভালদৰে উল্লেখ কৰা হয়।; and

(b) চিত্ৰসমূহৰ বিষয় সম্পৰ্কীয় হয় আৰু লগতে ভাল শিৰোনাম দিয়াটো বাঞ্চনীয়।.^[10]

ভাল প্ৰবন্ধ কোনবোৰ নহয়?

Stand-alone lists, portals, sounds, and images: these items should be nominated for featured list, featured portal, featured sounds, and featured picture status, respectively.
Disambiguation pages and stubs: these pages cannot meet the criteria.
Featured articles: a good article loses its status when promoted to a featured article. Featured articles which lose their status are not automatically graded as good articles and must be reassessed for quality.

আৰু চাওক

en:Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles—a detailed editing guideline on the mechanics of reviewing an article for GA status.
en:Wikipedia:What the Good article criteria are not—an essay which emphasizes that good article reviews should be concluded only in accordance with the good article criteria, not personal preferences.
Wikipedia:Featured article criteria

টোকা

↑ Good articles are only measured against the good article criteria; at the time of assessment, they may or may not meet featured article criteria.
↑ Make sure you are not viewing a vandalised version of the article.
↑ Small articles that have a single main source may still be adequately referenced without the use of inline citations. Inline citations may not be required for some articles; the criteria name the only six types of material that require inline citations.
↑ Articles on controversial topics can be both neutral and stable, but this is only ensured if regular editors make scrupulous efforts to keep the article well-referenced. Note that neutrality does not mean that all points of view are covered equally: instead no point of view should be given undue weight.
↑ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
↑ Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.
↑ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
↑ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of constructive editing should be placed on hold.
↑ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
↑ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

[1] Good articles are only measured against the good article criteria; at the time of assessment, they may or may not meet featured article criteria.

[check-2] Make sure you are not viewing a vandalised version of the article.

[refs-3] Small articles that have a single main source may still be adequately referenced without the use of inline citations. Inline citations may not be required for some articles; the criteria name the only six types of material that require inline citations.

[npov-4] Articles on controversial topics can be both neutral and stable, but this is only ensured if regular editors make scrupulous efforts to keep the article well-referenced. Note that neutrality does not mean that all points of view are covered equally: instead no point of view should be given undue weight.

[5] Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.

[6] Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.

[7] This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.

[8] Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of constructive editing should be placed on hold.

[9] Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.

[10] The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]